The Covenant Universalist: Gog and Magog: Ezekiel 38–39 in the Light of Revelation 20

Introduction

The apocalyptic imagery of Gog and Magog in Ezekiel 38–39 has fueled centuries of eschatological speculation. In particular, the reappearance of these enigmatic figures in Revelation 20:7–10 has invited numerous interpretations, especially within futurist frameworks. However, the preterist perspective offers a historically grounded and symbolically coherent reading that situates both texts within the context of the first-century Church and its conflict with apostate Judaism and pagan Rome. This essay will explore the identity and symbolism of Gog and Magog in Ezekiel, trace their reinterpretation in the Apocalypse, and demonstrate how the preterist framework accounts for their appearance at the end of Revelation’s millennial period.

I. The Identity of Gog and Magog in Ezekiel 38–39

A. Historical and Literary Context

Ezekiel 38–39 describes a climactic eschatological invasion by Gog of the land of Magog, "the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal" (Ezek 38:2). This prophecy follows the vision of Israel’s restoration and precedes the apocalyptic vision of the new temple (Ezek 40–48). The timing and form of the prophecy suggest that it functions not as a literal prediction of geopolitical movements but as a symbolic depiction of the final threat to God's restored people.

Most scholars agree that Gog is not a known historical king but a symbolic figure representing the archetypal enemy of God and His people. The names “Meshech” and “Tubal” refer to regions in Asia Minor known from earlier biblical texts (Gen 10:2; 1 Chron 1:5), which had been associated with hostile, distant, and pagan nations.

B. Gog as the Archetype of Eschatological Opposition

Rather than describing a specific historical war, Ezekiel's portrayal of Gog depicts a mythic enemy whose defeat demonstrates Yahweh’s supremacy and Israel’s vindication. Gog's invasion ends not in conquest but in catastrophe—divine fire, hailstones, disease, and confusion (Ezek 38:22)—culminating in God’s glorification before the nations. The hyperbolic language, the massive burial of Gog’s forces in the “Valley of Hamon-Gog” (Ezek 39:11), and the seven-year burning of weapons (Ezek 39:9) point toward a richly symbolic rather than literal referent.

C. Relevance to Ezekiel’s Audience

For Ezekiel’s sixth-century BCE audience, the Gog oracle functioned as a reassurance that even after Israel's restoration, no enemy—however formidable—would succeed in threatening the people of God. Gog’s defeat affirms God’s sovereignty over history and His protection of the eschatological community. Thus, the Gog prophecy belongs to the theological imagination of Israel’s post-exilic hope, not to predictive literalism.

II. Gog and Magog in Revelation 20

A. Literary Context in Revelation

Revelation 20 presents the post-millennial revolt of “Gog and Magog,” who, at Satan’s release from the abyss, gather to wage war against the “camp of the saints and the beloved city” (Rev 20:8–9). This narrative, set after the symbolic “thousand years” of Christ’s reign, draws directly from Ezekiel’s imagery but alters its setting and scope. Here, Gog and Magog are no longer a single northern aggressor but symbolic of “the nations in the four corners of the earth” (Rev 20:8), encompassing universal rebellion.

B. Symbolic Transformation in the Apocalypse

The preterist approach sees John’s use of Ezekiel as typological rather than predictive. Gog and Magog no longer represent a specific geopolitical threat but the embodiment of eschatological rebellion—particularly that of apostate Judaism and imperial Rome, both of which persecuted the early Church. In this view, Revelation uses Ezekiel’s imagery to depict the final resurgence of satanic opposition at the conclusion of redemptive history, culminating in divine judgment.

Importantly, this climactic scene in Revelation is not situated in some remote eschatological future but symbolizes the ultimate futility of resisting God’s kingdom—a resistance already embodied in Rome’s persecution and Jerusalem’s apostasy in the first century. The judgment fire that devours the enemies (Rev 20:9) recalls Ezekiel’s divine fire (Ezek 38:22), while Satan’s final doom echoes God’s defeat of Gog.

III. Theological Implications in a Preterist Framework

A. The Millennial Reign as the Church Age

Preterists typically interpret the “thousand years” of Revelation 20 as symbolic of the Church age inaugurated by Christ’s resurrection and ascension. During this period, Satan is “bound” in the sense that he cannot deceive the nations as he once did (Rev 20:2–3). The post-millennial rebellion, then, is not a literal event in distant future history, but a symbolic representation of the climactic opposition faced by the early Church, culminating in the fall of Jerusalem in AD 70 or the later collapse of Roman persecution.

B. Gog and Magog as First-Century Enemies

Under this paradigm, Gog and Magog symbolize the coalition of spiritual and political forces arrayed against the early Christians. Apostate Israel, allied with pagan Rome, embodies this rebellion. Just as Ezekiel’s Gog arises after Israel’s restoration, so Revelation’s Gog and Magog appear after the Church’s establishment. Their defeat, therefore, refers not to a global military confrontation but to the vindication of the faithful through divine judgment against their enemies—preeminently fulfilled in the destruction of Jerusalem and the temple.

C. Final Judgment as the Theological Center

Revelation 20 does not teach a second literal battle after a future millennium but recapitulates the imagery of final opposition to depict the ultimate defeat of evil. John’s adaptation of Ezekiel signals that the enemies of God—whether ancient foes like Babylon and Gog, or contemporary powers like Rome and apostate Jerusalem—will inevitably fall. This theology of victory finds its final resolution not in military conquest but in the consummation of God's purposes: the new heaven and new earth (Rev 21–22).

Conclusion

From a preterist standpoint, the figures of Gog and Magog function as apocalyptic archetypes of rebellion, not literal enemies to emerge in a far-off future. Ezekiel’s vision symbolizes the eschatological confidence of post-exilic Israel, while Revelation reinterprets that vision through the lens of Christ’s triumph over first-century adversaries. Far from forecasting geopolitical events in the 21st century or beyond, these texts proclaim the certainty of divine victory over all cosmic and earthly opposition. In this light, Gog and Magog are not predictors of Armageddon, but poetic affirmations of Christ's sovereign lordship over history.

Bibliography

Beale, G. K. The Book of Revelation: A Commentary on the Greek Text. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1999.
Chilton, David. The Days of Vengeance: An Exposition of the Book of Revelation. Tyler, TX: Dominion Press, 1987.
Fairbairn, Patrick. Ezekiel and the Book of His Prophecy. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1851.
Gentry, Kenneth L. Before Jerusalem Fell: Dating the Book of Revelation. Powder Springs, GA: American Vision, 1998.
Wright, N. T. The New Testament and the People of God. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1992.